[ Home | Eschatology | Bible Studies | Classics | Articles | Sermons | Apologetics | Search | F.A.Q. ]

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by Rich Aikers on Today at 04:39:14 AM »

 :GoodPopst: Awesome post Bear! Jesus put it this way.

Matthew 6:21-22
"For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light."

 :ditto:  Time for Christians to be Christians and not political hacks. To stand for truth and not political parties. To support the conversion of sinners souls rather than their political ideologies. As the false teaching by Arnold Kennedy proves,

http://www.hope-of-israel.org/unfortunateword.html

We have our work cut out for us. It only proves, Satan is the great deceiver. Look what he did to the nation of Israel and today's churches that support that same doctrine.

2
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by Rich Aikers on Today at 04:35:06 AM »


Okay, for example:

Did YEHOVAH God make a great non-Israel “Gentile” nation out of Abraham and did Abraham father many Gentiles?

Yes. The great nation that is the Gentile church established by Christ, and promised to Abraham and his seed, which is Christ.

I Peter 2:9
"But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:"

And who do we think governs this mighty nation?

Isaiah 9:6
"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace."


Quote
Was that great nation other than Israel?

It was Israel, but not Israel of the flesh who rejected Christ as ruler over them.


Quote
Did not Israel have many tribes which are sometimes referred to as “nations” (goyim)?


Of coursem, because thety were individual groups and families (which nations means), the tribe of Judah, the tribe of Benjamin, etc.


Quote
Why did Arnold insisted that non-Israel "Gentile" nation can't come from Abraham since he did not father the Gentiles? Pride? Blindness? Misunderstood?

Because he starts out with a assumption that Gentiles are actually Jews and then tries to find support for that. The reason is obviously because in his vanity he doesn't want to admit that non-Jews are saved by Christ as well? This contradicts everything Christ stood for. So his premise is not true, and so everything he says after that based on that premise must also be judged untrue. The false premise is his understanding that the word translated Gentiles means dispersed Jews. That conclusion is not based on any sound bible study or anything the bible says, but his own subjective and biased reasoning.

Genesis 10:5
"By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations."

From the very beginning in Genesis we see the word translated Gentiles referring to the nations, not the Jewish people. Both words there Gentiles and Nations are the very same word gowy, referring to the nations of the world and not Jews.


Quote
Why did Arnold insisted that non-Israel "Gentile" nation can't come from Abraham since he did not father the Gentiles?

That's a good question but one that is not difficult to answer. He is obviously defining Jews by flesh or direct lineage, a method that God's word plainly says is wrong. So why would anyone listen to this man when he clearly is not listening to God?

Romans 2:25-29
 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.
 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law?
 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Beware those who deny the word. Does he not understand what "he is not a Jew by flesh" means? Or what the uncircumcision being made the circumcision means? Or what "all Israel are not really Israel, but in Isaac shall thy seed be called," must  means? It means there are no Gentiles when the seed of Abraham, which is Christ, makes them Jews.


3
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by Reformed Baptist on Today at 01:10:02 AM »
Obviously you missed my point, which was that you guys are an angry peanut gallery with your eyes always on the world, its morality (not the church's), its taxes, race baiting, national pride, exclusionism, physical Jews and kingdoms (Fred, George, Dan), the mammon of unrighteousness, etc.

And of course, you still miss the point. It's not about us vs them in politics or race, it's about us vs them in the church and its enemies. Not because I don't want to pay health care for some poor soul, but because I don't want my church taking its eyes off itself and placing them on things that in the big picture don't matter. What I mean is, just as Tony said, we're never going to change the world, nor was that the job given us. We weren't called to be watchmen of the world, but to be a light of the world. We were set as watchmen of the Lord's house, and you guys (named) are so angry about the world and its politics and so busy with that agenda you don't even recognize truth when you hear it. I don't apologize for saying that, because it is the truth. When's the last time You, John, Bram or Philly Dawg posted anything that wasn't about politics, race, fake news, Trump or the liberal media? I rest my case.

 :GoodPopst: Awesome post Bear! Jesus put it this way.

Matthew 6:21-22
"For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light."

4
Theology / The Floating Ax - 2nd Kings 6:1-7
« Last post by Erik Diamond on Yesterday at 03:08:17 PM »

2Ki 6:1-7
[1]  And the sons of the prophets said unto Elisha, Behold now, the place where we dwell with thee is too strait for us.
[2]  Let us go, we pray thee, unto Jordan, and take thence every man a beam, and let us make us a place there, where we may dwell. And he answered, Go ye.
[3]  And one said, Be content, I pray thee, and go with thy servants. And he answered, I will go.
[4]  So he went with them. And when they came to Jordan, they cut down wood.
[5]  But as one was felling a beam, the axe head fell into the water: and he cried, and said, Alas, master! for it was borrowed.
[6]  And the man of God said, Where fell it? And he shewed him the place. And he cut down a stick, and cast it in thither; and the iron did swim.
[7]  Therefore said he, Take it up to thee. And he put out his hand, and took it.

Does anyone know the point or spiritual signification of this story? Why did Elisha went to great lengths to return a borrowed item?
5
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by Erik Diamond on Yesterday at 02:48:19 PM »
Quote
I do agree with his overall understanding about the Jewish people being a special people set apart from the heathen nations. They are a special people and that can't be taken from them.Deuteronomy 7:6"For a holy people art thou unto Jehovah thy God: Jehovah thy God hath chosen thee to be unto him a people for a possession, above all the peoples that are upon the face of the earth".You can't take that away from the Jews.

Actually, you need to compare the verse with the rest of Scripture:

Deu 7:6
[6]  For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.

Deu 14:2
[2]  For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God, and the LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth.

And Peter speaking to the New Testament Congregation, said the same way:

1Pe 2:9
[9]  But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:

Point being, God has chosen people, Jews and Gentiles, out of all nations, including national Israel, to be His Holy People, and a peculiar people, starting with Old Testament congregation and then New Testament congregation. God is talking about His Covenant Israel which is a holy nation.  Not Middle Eastern nation of Israel.
6
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by Erik Diamond on Yesterday at 02:31:25 PM »
Quote from: Chicago Bear
Thank you, but I would much rather prefer you open your eyes and turn them away from the world and put them on understanding the real work of Christ. The work I say you don't understand we all should be doing. I'll change my mind when I open my bible and see Jesus ranting about having to pay Roman taxes, or Peter angry because the government allowed an Ethiopian into the country, or Paul upset because the liberals of his country wouldn't listen and stop leading the Jews down a sinful path. But of course, they had more pressing priorities.Now please don't continue this, let's stay on topic, which is the salvation of the Gentiles. Gentiles being liberals, conservatives, blacks, whites, rich, poor, Romans, Greeks and yes, even Mexicans.

I totally understand your frustration.
7
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by Erik Diamond on Yesterday at 02:21:10 PM »

Erik, which point do you find interesting? Let's discuss it.


Okay, for example:
 
Quote from: Arnold Kennedy, "That Unfortunate Word "GENTILE


Let us look at some Old Testament Scriptures where the word Gowy, Goi or Goyim are used. If we apply the logic concerning “Gentiles” for these words, we can see the ridiculous conclusions that could be reached. Remember that Goi and Ethnos are used of Israel as well as of other races.


Genesis 12:1,2: "Now the LORD said unto Abram...and I will make of thee a great nation (goi)"


Genesis 17:5: "A father of many nations (goyim) have I made thee."


Did YEHOVAH God make a great non-Israel “Gentile” nation out of Abraham and did Abraham father many Gentiles? Was that great nation other than Israel? Did not Israel have many tribes which are sometimes referred to as “nations” (goyim)?

Why did Arnold insisted that non-Israel "Gentile" nation can't come from Abraham since he did not father the Gentiles? Pride? Blindness? Misunderstood?


8
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by Mila Ostrovsky on Yesterday at 12:58:54 PM »
Wow!  :amen:
9
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by Chicago Bear on Yesterday at 11:47:50 AM »
Chicago Bear,
Looks hypocritical when you specifically call out 5-6 of our names and in the same sentence accuse them of an" US versus them" mentality. Does that really help anything when you single out names?

Obviously you missed my point, which was that you guys are an angry peanut gallery with your eyes always on the world, its morality (not the church's), its taxes, race baiting, national pride, exclusionism, physical Jews and kingdoms (Fred, George, Dan), the mammon of unrighteousness, etc. Did you ever read of the apostle Paul worrying about such matters? Did you hear him justifying the Jewish leaders simply because He was a Pharisee, or they were of his former party? He left that to the people with their eyes on the world, and he placed his on a government ruled from heaven.

And of course, you still miss the point. It's not about us vs them in politics or race, it's about us vs them in the church and its enemies. Not because I don't want to pay health care for some poor soul, but because I don't want my church taking its eyes off itself and placing them on things that in the big picture don't matter. What I mean is, just as Tony said, we're never going to change the world, nor was that the job given us. We weren't called to be watchmen of the world, but to be a light of the world. We were set as watchmen of the Lord's house, and you guys (named) are so angry about the world and its politics and so busy with that agenda you don't even recognize truth when you hear it. I don't apologize for saying that, because it is the truth. When's the last time You, John, Bram or Philly Dawg posted anything that wasn't about politics, race, fake news, Trump or the liberal media? I rest my case.

It shows your mind is not on Christ but on the world and its current events. So again, it's not liberals against conservatives, Republicans against Democrats, it's that world that is against the church. We are soldiers in a army, but its not political. Why can't you and the rest of the angry peanut gallery see that without being offended? My guess is stubbornness or what my granny use to call pigheadedness.


Quote
You aren't the only one that does this.  Not only that but accuse "us" of not understanding the work of Christ.

You clearly don't, since you think it is to support the wild (and some might say crazy) theories going around the internet, the lies of the radical right. Even as others support the wild and crazy theories and lies of the radical left. What you don't understand is that they are both of the same unrepentant groups under rule of Satan. They both actually think that they are doing good in the world. The only real good we can do is spread the gospel of Christ, not Trump, Obama or Clinton. Christians aren't on either side, they are on the side of truth, which is in Christ. I don't think Trump is a man of God anymore than I thought Obama, Clinton or George Bush was. But they are appointed leaders. It's like the Scribes vs the Pharisees, they were those appointed to lead, but they are both cut out of the same cloth. It's foolish for me to side with one when they are both the same enemies of God. That's like some Christians here siding with Israel because they say they love God. Does that mean Israel is God's anointed people. Those who know different say no, and for their good work they get called antisemitic. The anger of these people is no different than Yours, Bram's, John's or Fred over liberals, immigrants or obamacare. Your eyes are on the wrong place. I do not apologize for saying that.


Quote
I forgive you

Thank you, but I would much rather prefer you open your eyes and turn them away from the world and put them on understanding the real work of Christ. The work I say you don't understand we all should be doing. I'll change my mind when I open my bible and see Jesus ranting about having to pay Roman taxes, or Peter angry because the government allowed an Ethiopian into the country, or Paul upset because the liberals of his country wouldn't listen and stop leading the Jews down a sinful path. But of course, they had more pressing priorities.

Now please don't continue this, let's stay on topic, which is the salvation of the Gentiles. Gentiles being liberals, conservatives, blacks, whites, rich, poor, Romans, Greeks and yes, even Mexicans.

10
Eschatology / Re: The Salvation of the Gentiles
« Last post by aquatic on Yesterday at 10:13:05 AM »
Chicago Bear,
Looks hypocritical when you specifically call out 5-6 of our names and in the same sentence accuse them of an" US versus them" mentality. Does that really help anything when you single out names? You aren't the only one that does this.  Not only that but accuse "us" of not understanding the work of Christ.

I forgive you
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

[ Home | Eschatology | Bible Studies | Classics | Articles | Sermons | Apologetics | Search | F.A.Q. ]